Science, Medicine networking event helps grow research productivity
Faculty members in Science and Medicine came together recently for a special networking event.
For the first time, researchers in both units sat down to discuss their individual areas of research and possible opportunities to work together.
The idea came about when Dr. Proton Rahman, associate dean of research with the Faculty of Medicine, met with Dr. Len Zedel, associate dean of research and graduate studies with the Faculty of Science, to consider potential opportunities for collaboration between the two faculties.
鈥淎t the meeting, Dr. Rahman indicated that Medicine was hoping to foster links between Science and clinical researchers in the Faculty Medicine in particular,鈥 said Dr. Zedel. 鈥淎s we talked, the scope of opportunities was not really clear to me, and, I suspect, either of us. I could identify some obvious faculty members or departments that might have interest, but it seemed somewhat inappropriate for me to identify potential partners.鈥
He suggested they invite all faculty to a 鈥渃onnector event鈥 instead and, to gauge interest, discussed the idea with department heads in the Faculty of Science. Their response was beyond his expectations, says Dr. Zedel, with interest from virtually all units鈥攊ncluding some he hadn鈥檛 anticipated to hear from at all.
Dr. Zedel stresses the collaboration was initiated by Medicine, but any time there are collaborations across disciplines, it opens up new opportunities for research in new areas.
鈥淏y facilitating such collaborations, we grow research activity and productivity in the university as a whole,鈥 he said.
The format of the event saw presentations on a mix of research projects that spanned basic sciences, clinical research, community-based projects and more. Researchers from both faculties give short, minute-and-a-half talks using one Powerpoint slide to highlight important points. At the conclusion, presenters mingled and made their own arrangements for followup discussions.
Dr. Rahman says the event allowed the two faculties to share a lot of valuable research information in a very short amount of time.
鈥淚 was impressed by the breadth of people who came,鈥 said Dr. Rahman. 鈥淭here was a wide mix of people from very different areas of research. We weren鈥檛 expecting full-on research projects to come out of it, per se, but the event was held to provide a chance for people to connect.
鈥淲e now have an opportunity for more focused programs in the future, and we鈥檙e still looking at future themes and ideas to incorporate. One possible area is examining qualitative and quantitative research.鈥
Both parties consider the event an overwhelming success.
鈥淢any attendees were surprised by the range of research happening at 糖心视频, and many didn鈥檛 know what others were doing,鈥 said Dr. Rahman. 鈥淓ven within the Faculty of Medicine, we have many areas of research 鈥 clinical, biomedical and community health and humanities 鈥 yet many of our researchers are not aware of each other鈥檚 passions and projects.鈥
鈥淚 was a bit unsure about the short presentations, but, the room had energy, almost a party atmosphere,鈥 added Dr. Zedel. 鈥淎fter the formal presentations, there was no real need to structure the group. People stood around at the refreshments table and chatted with old and new acquaintances for about an hour and then slowly drifted away.鈥
Both associate deans say feedback since then has been overwhelmingly positive with researchers suggesting it be done again with different faculties, or even networking events for those just within their own faculties.
鈥淚 am already aware of two immediate efforts at collaboration that arose even before the meeting,鈥 said Dr. Zedel. 鈥淚鈥檓 not aware of exactly how many linkages have been formed since, but I鈥檓 sure there have been a few. Even myself, who was there more as a bystander, actually established a potential teaching collaboration through the process!鈥